?

Log in

No account? Create an account
 
 
29 January 2014 @ 07:46 am
Science fiction for people who hate science fiction  
Bizarre idea. If people really hate science fiction, they shouldn't have to read it. It's not cruciferous vegetables in the intellectual diet. So of course, we're really talking about people who erroneously think they hate science fiction, but would love it if they got to the good stuff.

Here's io9 with a panel taking the approach of "entry level" science fiction, which gets rid of some of the problems. One thing this panel makes obvious is that "sf," or as John Clute would say, "fantastika," is a house that contains many mansions. For instance, one panelist wants to get people to read heroic fantasy. I've been reading sf for 60 years, and no one has ever gotten me to read heroic fantasy. Paolo Bacigalupi thinks people will want to read stories about how the world will be even shittier in the near future as long as they're not scared off by that nasty Science Fiction label.

We have recommendations for tales that are full of human interest but go easy on the explanation (The Handmaid's Tale) or have wonderful prose and characterization but How We Got There or How It Works make my crap detector not only ring but set off rockets and smoke bombs ("Aye, and Gomorrah," Never Let Me Go).

I don't want to minimize the problem. A lot of sf is written for people who are familiar with sf, and a lot the older stuff suffers from defects that weren't obvious at the time. N.K. Jemisin recommends Childhood's End, but warns of the racial aspects. Stranger in a Strange Land was a great gateway book in the 60s, but now its acceptance of unexamined assumptions about the roles of the sexes makes it unreadable for many. (And I for one am still grateful for many of the things it taught me in other areas.) With all the difficulties, the panel has some really good suggestions from, among others, John Scalzi and Seanan McGuire, whose own work is recommended by others.

The whole thing reminds me that I am odd, even among science fiction readers. I don't like popular fiction. There, I said it. I do not enjoy suspense and adventure. Pop fiction, like alcohol and sodomy, gets so much moralistic opposition that many of those who enjoy it can't imagine anyone refraining just because they don't find it fun, but that's how I feel. I took up sf because it was Good to Think With--what if they do this? how will it work? what happens next?--and I put up with Story Values to get what I wanted. Perhaps the people who erroneously think they don't like sf should be reassured that it isn't just for people like me.
Tags:
 
 
 
Kalimac: puzzlekalimac on January 29th, 2014 04:38 pm (UTC)
When Terry Carr published an anthology in the early 1970s titled Science Fiction for People Who Hate Science Fiction, he made the assumption, typical for his generation, that what people hated was either Gernsback or Planet Stories, and he makes this clear in his introduction.

So he picked stories of sober literary quality, many of them real gut-punchers like Clarke's "The Star" and Fred Brown's "The Weapon". But the problem is, that doesn't help with readers who don't like SF because it punches them in the gut too much. (That's essentially Bacigalupi's problem as well.)

Some of the recommendations on the list are of books in their capacities as good mainstream novels, apart from their SF content. The problem is that, of those that I've read, it seemed to me that their mainstream quality was exactly where they fell down. RC Wilson's Spin struck me as an extremely dull, routine, uninteresting mainstream novel with a good, short, punchy SF novel in it trying to get out. And MD Russell's The Sparrow had solid SF content packed inside a truly inept mainstream frame. The popular non-SF novels I read are oceans more competent at it than either of those.

By the way, you say you won't read heroic fantasy, but A Wizard of Earthsea and The Last Unicorn are about as far removed from conventional heroic fantasy as is compatible with "wizard in a faux-medieval setting." I wouldn't call them "heroic fantasy" at all. "High fantasy" is the term I'd use. "Heroic fantasy" seems to be a term used by Sword & Sorcery fans who want to co-opt high fantasy under their umbrella.